North Yorkshire’s low education funding sparks calls for action
North Yorkshire’s low education funding sparks calls for action

North Yorkshire’s low education funding sparks calls for action

23 January 2026

Education leaders are urging local MPs to help to highlight the significant funding gaps facing pupils in North Yorkshire compared with other areas across the country.

North Yorkshire Council is a member of the f40 group – a coalition of the UK’s 43 lowest-funded local authorities. The group campaigns for fairer and increased education funding, and major reform and investment in special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).

MPs in the county are now being asked to help to petition the Government to highlight the lower levels of funding that North Yorkshire Council receives compared to other local authorities nationally and to promote the campaign for a fairer deal from the Department for Education.

Despite rising costs and increasing demand, North Yorkshire ranks 50th lowest out of 151 local authority areas in England for Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) funding and ninth lowest for High Needs funding.

The DSG provides financial support to local authorities to fund schools, high needs pupils and early years education.

 

The council’s executive member for education, learning and skills, Cllr Wilkinson said:

This is about ensuring fairness, opportunity and a better future for our children, who need to have the assistance and tools to reach their true potential. However, teachers and pupils in North Yorkshire are not receiving their fair share.

The difference between our funding and that of the highest‑funded areas is enormous.

Our schools achieve remarkable things, but they need equitable funding to give every child the chances they deserve.

I am calling on our MPs to please stand with us and push for change.

 

There are 351 schools in total across North Yorkshire with almost 80,000 children and young people educated in the county. Meanwhile, the number of children with Educational Health Care Plans (EHCPs) in the county has risen from 1,700 in 2015 to more than 6,200 in 2026.

The council continues to receive significantly less per pupil than many other areas. For DSG funding, the highest‑funded local authority receives £14,181 per pupil compared with just £9,299 in North Yorkshire.

For high needs (SEND) funding, North Yorkshire gets far less than the highest‑funded area – £1,114 per pupil compared with £3,831.Pending the publication of the Schools White Paper setting out the

Government’s new direction of travel for education and the anticipated reforms to SEND, North Yorkshire Council is asking for the reforms to be powerful enough to support schools to offer inclusive mainstream education, backed by fairer and increased funding to enable them to be properly implemented.

 

North Yorkshire Council’s corporate director for children and young people’s service, El Mayhew, said:

We are the largest council in the country, covering rural, urban and coastal communities, and we have more small schools than any other authority in England.

The gap between the best‑funded and least‑funded authorities is unacceptably large, leaving children and young people in North Yorkshire at a clear disadvantage compared with their peers.

Being funded the same as the average local authority area would make a huge difference to children’s educational experiences, opportunities and outcomes.

 

North Yorkshire’s low education funding sparks calls for action
(from left to right) is Emma Lambden, El Mayhew and Cllr Annabel Wilkinson

 

A fairer funding deal would allow North Yorkshire Council to make significant progress in its key priorities for ensuring the best possible opportunities for all pupils in the county. One of the major aims is to help children with SEND to be educated in mainstream schools as close as possible to their homes.

 

The headteacher of Thirsk High School and Sixth-Form College, Emma Lambden, said:

Children and young people are the future and if we don’t invest in them we won’t achieve societal or economic growth.

In a time where we are seeing more young people with increasing SEND and mental health needs, but reduced capacity to support from external services, where else can young people access support but school?

Yes, our priority is to educate, but young people spend most of their time in school, and we know that they won’t be able to thrive academically if they are not supported holistically.

It makes sense that we throw as much support and resource as we can at the young people in our care, but without proper funding we simply cannot fully give them the support they deserve.

 

A comment was requested from Tom Gordon MP>

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Latest Posts

Following customers’ complaints and a Trading Standards’ investigation, York Crown Court has sentenced a man to 10 month’s imprisonment for unfair trading offences. Liam Wilkinson, aged 25 of Eastbourne Road, Darlington paid a total £8,095 compensation for his victims, ahead of appearing in court on 30 October 2025 when he pleaded guilty to two offences. He was then sentenced on Friday 16 January 2026. City of York Council’s Trading Standards officers began investigating Mr Wilkinson’s activities in August 2024 after receiving complaints about his business, Brit-Plas. Brit-Plas leaflets were dropped around the city offering to replace UPVC guttering for a “genuine quotation” of £1,295. The leaflet claimed Brit-Plas is Yorkshire’s leading roofline specialists and “only when you are completely satisfied do you make the final payment.” The leaflet advertised this price to “recess your old wooden fascias, bargeboards, gutters and downpipes and replace them with new UPVC ventilated soffits, new UPVC fascias, new bargeboards and new guttering and downpipe system”. The leaflet offered free scaffolding and a 15-year guarantee. Four customers complained that when additional work was found to be required on their homes, it significantly increased the price. They said that the work completed was poor quality, and that their properties were left in a mess and were damaged because scaffolding wasn’t used as promised. After heavy rain, the customers found the new guttering leaked badly. An expert employed by Trading Standards found that the promises made by the trader, as set out in the marketing material, had not been delivered. They said that the approach to costing and execution of the work was most unprofessional, and aimed to mislead householders into believing that quality work would be delivered at a reasonable price. Despite the guarantee, the work had been found to have a more limited life, and some areas had already started failing. The workmanship fell below the standard normally expected. One customer described how they were repeatedly harassed for payment after the work had been completed. Workmen came to their house, banged on the window, shouted and swore. Cllr Jenny Kent, Executive Member for Environment at City of York Council, said: “Complaints about roofing and household repairs continue to top Trading Standards list and this is a particularly worrying case. We should be able to trust tradespeople to do good work on our homes, and prices should be honoured and not inflated to extortionate levels. Harassment is unacceptable and this case demonstrates how seriously the courts take these matters. “We urge consumers to get a few quotes from recommended traders, follow personal recommendations and look into companies as much as before agreeing to any work.” To share your concerns about poor quality workmanship, please call Trading Standards via the Citizens Advice Consumer helpline on 0808 223 1133.

23 January 2026
Go toTop